Loaded, Leading
Gordon Smith and the Klamath Fish Kill
The Smearing of Betsy Johnson


Mesothelioma


Learn more about mesothelioma cancer and other asbestos-related diseases.

NiewertAward NiewertAward


Poll
Should the Lieberman Health Care Bill Be Killed?
Yes
No
Wait and See
Not Sure

Results

LoadedO Blogger Archives
Loaded Orygun

Click here to find our archives from February 2006 through July 14, 2007

Search




Advanced Search


Send email to LoadedO!
Follow LoadedO on Twitter!
Find your favorite Trail Blazers memorabilia including jerseys and apparel

Updated: Schrader DOES NOT Support Med + 5% Public Option

by: torridjoe

Wed Oct 28, 2009 at 13:50:34 PM PDT


Update, 3pm--

well, thanks to a quick return of my voicemail, we can correct this erroneous story forthwith: according to Schrader spokesman James Atkin, the story I just reported is NOT accurate, and in fact the opposite is true; Schrader opposes Med +5 in favor of a negotiated rates option that he believes will in fact be the presented version on the floor. The reason given was the standard complaint that rural providers would be badly hurt by such a plan. When asked whether he was OK with his favored plan costing taxpayers $85bil more than a Med +5 alternative, Atkin demurred on the basis of floor fights yet to come. So to repeat: this story is NOT confirmed; in fact it is directly contradicted by the Congressman's office.

---------------------

In light of the fact that freshman Congressman Kurt Schrader (OR-5) has to this point maintained virtual media silence on his views regarding the public option alternatives swirling about in the House, I think this is important news to relay: what I've discovered from a source with knowledge of one of the various whip counts being performed within the caucus recently is that Schrader has signed on to support the most progressive alternative currently being floated--the so-called "Med +5" option that pegs provider reimbursements to Medicare rates plus 5%. 

This is significant because that's the version Speaker Pelosi wants to get to the floor, and according to recent reports is very, very close but is not quite there.

Until as late as this past Friday, target lists being used by progressives to pressure individual lawmakers still included Schrader as an unknown on the subject. (In fact, his appearance was rather conspicuous by the various misspellings of his name in the appeals.) Last week Carla Axtman at Blue Oregon posed the question as well--sparking a bit of an intra-editor squabble over whether he did, or didn't. As it sussed out, Schrader has long been publicly supportive of a PO in general, but has remained mum on what types of POs he would support--such as Med+5.

Earlier this morning, however, newer target lists being circulated did not include Schrader. I asked around, and one person with knowledge of one of the whip counts indicated that Schrader was now listed as a "yes," I have made a call and left a message for Schrader's communications staff to confirm the information, but I trust my source and am willing to say with that caveat that Schrader appears to be on board.

Obviously that's excellent news, and it brings the House one step closer to a truly robust alternative for the public option. But as Carla does, I can't help but wonder why it's such a big secret, or why he alone among Democratic Reps from Oregon would be hesitating in his support. Hopefully we'll get a confirm from his staff, and can bring his laudatory decision to the forefront.  

 

 

torridjoe :: Updated: Schrader DOES NOT Support Med + 5% Public Option
Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Rep Schrader; Thumbs Down (0.00 / 0)
I do not believe Rep Schrader Represents his People First!

I am now wondering if the BigPharma/MedCorps/Ins Co's "got to him".

He Most likely will NOT be serving a second term for "The 5th".
This is Not the only health care issue he does Not support.

We need a GOOD, Strong Candidate for "The 5th".  I personally want a candidate that Listens to the People he/she serves and has the Capacity AND Willingness to "set aside" personal Beliefs in order to serve Constituents.  
This candidate will have a Work History to Prove that "All people are first" in his or her career..Not just "pretty words" vowing he/she "will serve the people" post election and then "stab constituents in the Back" on Important matters.

That does NOT include just listening to the minority that Agrees with you...and saying "It's a Majority"!

I am very disappointed, so far.  If He doesn't Do Better, WE Will!


"I trust my source" (0.00 / 0)
Oops.  Guess you should have waited the 70 minutes before relying on a single-source tip (that was, apparently, not close to the subject of your "scoop".)

So, does this little episode make it more or less likely that you'll be considered a "journalist" in future squabbles with public agencies?


Still do (0.00 / 0)
The issue is apparently with the whip list, not the source. And no, I shouldn't have waited, given that I indicated it was unconfirmed and a call was in to the Rep's office. I reported it as less than definitive and subject to confirm.

And I'd say using an anonymous source with inaccurate information makes me MORE like what passes for a journalist. Conceding the nature of the sourcing and immediately correcting--now THAT might set me apart from the trad-med, yeah.

Wassamatter, snarky? Bored?  


[ Parent ]

Return to LO home...!


RSS Feed: http://www.loadedorygun.net/rss/rss2.xml
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Change.org|Start Petition

Put your message up top!


Blog ads are good karma...

Thanks for Saving Soapblox! (and by extension, LO!)


Loaded Links
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless

Powered by: SoapBlox