Loaded, Leading
Gordon Smith and the Klamath Fish Kill
The Smearing of Betsy Johnson


Mesothelioma


Learn more about mesothelioma cancer and other asbestos-related diseases.

NiewertAward NiewertAward


Poll
Should the Lieberman Health Care Bill Be Killed?
Yes
No
Wait and See
Not Sure

Results

LoadedO Blogger Archives
Loaded Orygun

Click here to find our archives from February 2006 through July 14, 2007

Search




Advanced Search


Send email to LoadedO!
Follow LoadedO on Twitter!
Find your favorite Trail Blazers memorabilia including jerseys and apparel

Hooley (Update--and Earl!) on Impeachment: NOT Off Table

by: torridjoe

Thu Sep 06, 2007 at 16:13:02 PM PDT


One of the more frustrating things for many Oregon ians has been the blind spot of the Democratic delegation for courageously taking on the mantle of Constitutional stewardship, and honestly considering impeachment proceedings against the VP and President. None of the seven Members of Congress from the Beaver State have even hinted that impeachment was "on the table."

Until now, that is. From remarks forwarded by senior staff and to be part of Hooley's statement in front of constituents in Lake Oswego this evening:


I've heard from many Oregonians who are frustrated about how we got into the Iraq war, how the war's been mismanaged, and how the Bush Administration has abused its power whether it regards warrantless wiretapping or stonewalling Congress.  I will soon be introducing a resolution that calls on the President to encourage all relevant parties that have been subpoenaed to testify and not hide behind Executive Privilege.  Transparency is key to our democracy.

Oversight must be followed by accountability.  Impeachment is in the Constitution and should never, ever be off the table for any President.  Congress needs to right the wrongs of this Administration, and I want to ensure every tool is available to hold individuals accountable for their actions {emph mine}.


{more}

torridjoe :: Hooley (Update--and Earl!) on Impeachment: NOT Off Table

During the 110th Congress, I have cosponsored H. Res.530, legislation that calls for the censure of President Bush for his actions and the actions of members of his administration in the revelation of the identity of Valerie Plame Wilson.  It also condemns the stonewalling of the investigation led by special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, the perjury of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby about his role in revealing Mrs. Plame Wilson's identity and the commutation of Mr. Libby's prison sentence by President Bush.

I also led an effort with my colleagues from Oregon and California to have the House Committee on Natural Resources launch an investigation of Vice President Cheney regarding his involvement in the massive 2002 Klamath River fish kill which devastated fishing communities along the Pacific coast and led to the largest commercial fishing closure in U. S. history.  Resources Committee Chairman Nick Rahall (D-WV), has agreed to investigate whether or not their was any intentional wrongdoing by the Vice President or improper influence exerted by his office over decisions made by the Department of the Interior when it approved the diversion of water from the Klamath River.


Well, I wouldn't call it a resounding push for hearings, but it's not every day that Hooley gets to tack to the LEFT of the rest of the Dem delegation. And simply by acknowledging that impeachment HAS to be an available option if warranted, she's done that. But she gets no cookie from me until she signs onto Conyers' bill calling for such an inquiry of the Vice-President. Admitting that it should be part of the arsenal is one thing; I'd like to see her draw the weapon and wave it about a bit, y'know?

Hooley also mentions her role in getting oversight on Cheney for the Klamath fish kill; I'd like to know what results are coming from those hearings. (I'd already predicted there would be few to none, but maybe I'll be pleasantly surprised).

I'll give Hooley a B for effort on this one, with an Incomplete for follow-through.

Update, 10am--
Coincidence? Coordinated release? Or even--amazingly--Hooley pushing him to the left? Whatever the instigation, at Earl Blumenauer's website he is suddenly saying the same thing: it's not ripe yet, but it's not off the table. A little taste:


Democratic-led committees in the House and Senate are conducting unprecedented investigations into a broad range of Bush administration misdeeds. The information uncovered by these hearings can be used to hold people responsible for their crimes and abuses, either through Congressional action or criminal prosecutions.

These investigations are making significant impacts. There is no doubt in my mind that were it not for the thorough work of Congressional oversight and the probing research and questions from Democrats leading committees in the House and the Senate, Alberto Gonzalez would still be Attorney General and Karl Rove would still be calling the shots at the White House.

I believe that oversight must lead to accountability. Impeachment is among the range of options for Congress to consider as we seek to hold President Bush and others accountable for their actions. Impeachment may not be ripe, either procedurally or politically, now but that does not mean that it won't be in the future. Congress cannot let this administration off the hook or give them a "Get out of Jail Free" card by taking impeachment off the table.

While it is important that investigations and accountability measures be neither partisan nor political in nature, Congress must make the necessary effort to expose and punish the abuses of the last six and a half years. If these investigations show that impeachment is warranted and necessary, then Congress should not be afraid to take that step.

Way to go, Earl! Peter and David...you're up.

Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

This is a good start. Keep going. (0.00 / 0)
I will look forward to seeing where this all leads, Darlene!

What most people seem to not grasp about impechement (0.00 / 0)
Particularly most of our Congress-critters, is that impeachment is what ultimately backs-up and animates almost the less sweeping powers and tools to be the check on, and oversight authority of the Executive branch.

cheers,

Mitch Gore


keep the pressure on Earl (0.00 / 0)
Every Thursday, from noon-2pm, in front of Rep. Blumenauer's Portland office there's a regular demonstration to pressure Earl to support impeachment.

729 N.E. Oregon Street
Portland, OR 97232

And here's the office's phone number, just for the hell of it:  (503) 231-2300


connection with town hall meetings? (0.00 / 0)
i'm wondering if it's a coincidence that this comes so soon after ron wyden spent the month of august getting his hair blown back at town hall meetings around the state.  may he have had a word with the two good congress critters as a result?  if that's the case, people's participation was certainly not in vain.

Merkley as well (5.00 / 1)
at last nights Drinking Liberally he said, "Impeachment is always on the table".

add Jeff Merkely (0.00 / 0)
i still support Novick, but it was great to hear Jeff Merkley say the other day that impeachment is never off the table -- it's in the Constitution.  he then finished the rest of the thought, which is that until there are hearings to bring out the evidence (saying "Yea, but, we know they're guilty" is not evidence", unless you're Mark Slackmayer), you can't impeach.  and given where the calendar now is, means Bush & Cheney are not likely to be impeached (sorry, this sentence switches from Jeff's words to my conclusion) but (back to Jeff) he doubts any Democrat would pardon them.  draw your own conclusion: the investigations may not get them impeached, but that doesn't mean they won't be charged with crimes.

Today is Sept 9th (0.00 / 0)
If impeachment proceedings were actually started this very day, HOW LONG WILL IT TAKE until he/they is/are out of office, that is if the proceedings are NOT met with great resistance and legal delays in the process?
would censoring be the better avenue?Is this even worth it or should we spend time and money towards assuring a democrat sweep in '08?  is it not possible to open investigations into high crimes, misdemeanors and other violations, post presidential/vp term(s)?
we are dealing with so much historical precedence, i feel that the "impeachment ball" is the wrong ball to have our focus on.
Yes!  i want them out of office ever since the supreme court awarded bush et al the win in 2000, but it did not happen then nor at any other ideal moment in history, i just think winning in 08 is the priority and anything else is a distraction.
in spite of the dems win in 06, there just are not enough votes to accomplish te things we most wish to change.  we did well in 06, but just not quite well enough to accomplish the "tide turning votes" in numbers.


Process of Impeachment the goal (0.00 / 0)
Impeachment is possible after they leave office....just don't have to worry about the removal from office part.
Most people that I talk to, while they would obviously LOVE Bush/Cheney to be removed from office, are more concerned with seeing their Democratic representatives DO something.  Beginning impeachment proceedings doesn't mean that there needs to be enough votes, or that most of Congress needs to even believe in the administration's guilt.  It simply means that they will be investigated, and future Executives reminded that yes, there is a process, and yes it will be followed.  Mitch is right.  It is the process of oversight and the deterrant to future Executives grabbing for power, that impeachment investigations really represent.

Impeahcment IS removal from office... (0.00 / 0)
...and only removal form office. It is not a criminal charge and its only "punishment" is removal from office. So the premise of your post makes little sense.

cheers,

Mitch Gore


[ Parent ]
Impeachment is not removal (0.00 / 0)
Impeachment happens in the House...the conviction and removal from office happens in the Senate.  They are two distinct processes.  The decision to impeach, rendered by the House of Representatives is the constitutional equivalent to an indictment.  The articles of impeachment constitute the formal allegations. Upon their passage, the defendant has been "impeached."
It is theoretically possible to impeach after leaving office, although there is no precedent. Despite a conviction by the Senate, the defendant remains liable to criminal prosecution. It is possible to impeach someone even after the accused has vacated their office in order to disqualify the person from future office or from certain emoluments of their prior office (such as a pension). 

[ Parent ]
My original intended post this evening (0.00 / 0)
I actually wanted to share a letter I received from Mr. Blumenauer in response to probably my most heated letter to date that I've ever sent to him.  It is the longest, most thought out letter I've received from any representative I've ever written to.  I just want to get some other thoughts on it.

Thank you for contacting me about impeachment. As I talk with people throughout my district and Oregon, the issue of accountability and peace is very much on people's minds. I appreciate knowing your thoughts. I believe that Congress must hold the Bush Administration accountable for its actions and that impeachment should be among the options for accountability.

After having spent an incredible amount of time and energy to defeat George Bush and his Republican apologists in the last election, I have been outraged and, frankly, angry at the continued actions of this administration. I am also frustrated at Congress' inability to end the war and the ongoing abuses of our civil liberties. It is dismaying that more of my colleagues aren't willing to join with me to say "not another dime for the war in Iraq," and that, with almost all of the Republicans and some Democrats unwilling to take the hard votes, we don't have a working progressive majority in Congress.

I am doing everything in my power to stand up to this President. From the beginning, I have been an active and vocal opponent of his failed war in Iraq and have introduced comprehensive legislation, H.R. 663, to bring our troops home. I have pledged to vote against any additional funds for military operations in Iraq except for the safe and orderly withdrawal of our troops. I have fought against the politicization of the Justice Department and called for the impeachment of former Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez. In August, I voted against legislation to amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) because it broadened the administration's ability to spy on Americans without a court order or necessary oversight. The actions of this administration are eroding our basic rights and making our country less safe. Recently, more than 100 foreign policy experts from both political parties were surveyed about the war on terrorism. They overwhelmingly agreed that the war in Iraq is negatively affecting our national security.

While these are indeed troubling developments, the issue of whether or not to push impeachment is a difficult one. The Constitution sets an extremely high standard for impeachment that is triggered by "Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors." Therefore, I believe that investigations into the range of crimes and abuses must be the first step.

Democratic-led committees in the House and Senate are conducting unprecedented investigations into a broad range of Bush administration misdeeds. The information uncovered by these hearings can be used to hold people responsible for their crimes and abuses, either through Congressional action or criminal prosecutions.

These investigations are making significant impacts. There is no doubt in my mind that were it not for the thorough work of Congressional oversight and the probing research and questions from Democrats leading committees in the House and the Senate, Alberto Gonzalez would still be Attorney General and Karl Rove would still be calling the shots at the White House.

I believe that oversight must lead to accountability. Impeachment is among the range of options for Congress to consider as we seek to hold President Bush and others accountable for their actions. Impeachment may not be ripe, either procedurally or politically, now but that does not mean that it won't be in the future. Congress cannot let this administration off the hook or give them a "Get out of Jail Free" card by taking impeachment off the table.

While it is important that investigations and accountability measures be neither partisan nor political in nature, Congress must make the necessary effort to expose and punish the abuses of the last six and a half years. If these investigations show that impeachment is warranted and necessary, then Congress should not be afraid to take that step.

The ultimate act in accountability will be who controls the next Congress and who the next President is I will work to restore Americans' faith in their government as I continue to fight on the issues that matter to Oregonians. Standing up to President Bush and his destructive vision for America is critical to regaining control of our country and will make a difference in people's lives by ending the war, restoring our damaged constitutional protections, saving the planet from global warming, promoting tax fairness and solving the crisis in healthcare.

Sincerely,
Earl Blumenauer
Member of Congress


Return to LO home...!


RSS Feed: http://www.loadedorygun.net/rss/rss2.xml
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Change.org|Start Petition

Put your message up top!


Blog ads are good karma...

Thanks for Saving Soapblox! (and by extension, LO!)


Loaded Links
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless

Powered by: SoapBlox